Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 271D and u/s 271E - accepting and repayment of loan in cash in excess of ₹ 20,000/- section 269SS and section 269T - The appellant has not explained as to the urgency, compulsion or any other important circumstance for the breach and that too repeatedly - levy of penalty confirmed - HC
Penalty u/s 271D and u/s 271E - accepting and repayment of loan in cash in excess of ₹ 20,000/- section 269SS and section 269T - The appellant has not explained as to the urgency, compulsion or any other important circumstance for the breach and that too repeatedly - levy of penalty confirmed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.