Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Conviction under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Since in the cases of NDPS Act the punishment is severe, therefore strict proof is required for proving the search, seizure and the recovery - conviction of the appellant and the sentence imposed on him is set aside - SC
Conviction under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Since in the cases of NDPS Act the punishment is severe, therefore strict proof is required for proving the search, seizure and the recovery - conviction of the appellant and the sentence imposed on him is set aside - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.