Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denial of refund claim u/s 11B - SEZ - even if the appellants were not eligible for refund under Notification No.9/2009-ST, the appellants were clearly eligible for refund under section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. - HC
Denial of refund claim u/s 11B - SEZ - even if the appellants were not eligible for refund under Notification No.9/2009-ST, the appellants were clearly eligible for refund under section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.