Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Penalty u/s 114A and 114(iii) - only allegation against the appellants is that they have availed draw back claim wrongly - in the show-cause notice there is no proposal for confiscation of the goods - No penalty - AT
Penalty u/s 114A and 114(iii) - only allegation against the appellants is that they have availed draw back claim wrongly - in the show-cause notice there is no proposal for confiscation of the goods - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.