Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Penalty u/s 114A and 114(iii) - only allegation against the appellants is that they have availed draw back claim wrongly - in the show-cause notice there is no proposal for confiscation of the goods - No penalty - AT
Penalty u/s 114A and 114(iii) - only allegation against the appellants is that they have availed draw back claim wrongly - in the show-cause notice there is no proposal for confiscation of the goods - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.