Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund - there is no dispute that the duty was initially collected by the appellant from their customers, who had also availed cenvat credit and it was only subsequently that debit note were issued the lower authorities have rightly held the refund claim to be hit by the bar of unjust enrichment - AT
Refund - there is no dispute that the duty was initially collected by the appellant from their customers, who had also availed cenvat credit and it was only subsequently that debit note were issued the lower authorities have rightly held the refund claim to be hit by the bar of unjust enrichment - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
