Composite GST notices across tax periods breach separate limitation requirements, permitting fresh period-compliant proceedings where lawfully availab...
Bank-account freezing under anti-money-laundering law requires recorded reasons; writ review remains available despite an alternative statutory remedy...
GST amnesty appeals should not be rejected solely because the prescribed cash component of a pre-deposit was debited through the electronic credit ledger rather than the electronic cash ledger, where portal glitches prevented the required cash-ledger debit. Such misallocation is a curable pre-deposit defect when the amount has otherwise been secured. The appellate authority must allow the taxpayer to rectify the cash-ledger component or rebalance the ledger debits, including re-credit of excess electronic credit ledger debit. Following rectification within the stipulated period, the first appeal must be admitted and decided on merits after hearing both sides.
GST amnesty appeals should not be rejected solely because the prescribed cash component of a pre-deposit was debited through the electronic credit ledger rather than the electronic cash ledger, where portal glitches prevented the required cash-ledger debit. Such misallocation is a curable pre-deposit defect when the amount has otherwise been secured. The appellate authority must allow the taxpayer to rectify the cash-ledger component or rebalance the ledger debits, including re-credit of excess electronic credit ledger debit. Following rectification within the stipulated period, the first appeal must be admitted and decided on merits after hearing both sides.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4927 
