Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangemen...
Mobile-phone electronic evidence failed to establish customs undervaluation, while duty survived on non-authentic origin certificates without importer...
Cross-segment price manipulation may arise where futures orders...
Cross-segment derivatives manipulation: integrated order patterns can support interim restraints, while director liability requires responsibility, consent, connivance, or neglect.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cross-segment price manipulation may arise where futures orders are allegedly used to move prices or create artificial order-book signals so that larger, economically opposite options positions obtain favourable execution. Section 12A of the SEBI Act and Regulations 3 and 4 of the PFUTP Regulations prohibit manipulative or deceptive devices, false appearances of trading and price manipulation; liability depends on the integrated sequence of orders, price impact, options execution, cancellations, exposure and persistence, rather than opposite positions or LTP contribution alone. Section 27 attributes company contraventions to directors responsible for business conduct, subject to knowledge and due-diligence defences, and separately covers consent, connivance or neglect. Interim measures may restrict market access, impound proceeds and preserve assets; disgorgement is generally person-specific, though joint-and-several exposure may follow common intentional action or a central role.
Cross-segment price manipulation may arise where futures orders are allegedly used to move prices or create artificial order-book signals so that larger, economically opposite options positions obtain favourable execution. Section 12A of the SEBI Act and Regulations 3 and 4 of the PFUTP Regulations prohibit manipulative or deceptive devices, false appearances of trading and price manipulation; liability depends on the integrated sequence of orders, price impact, options execution, cancellations, exposure and persistence, rather than opposite positions or LTP contribution alone. Section 27 attributes company contraventions to directors responsible for business conduct, subject to knowledge and due-diligence defences, and separately covers consent, connivance or neglect. Interim measures may restrict market access, impound proceeds and preserve assets; disgorgement is generally person-specific, though joint-and-several exposure may follow common intentional action or a central role.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.