Timely pronouncement of reserved judgments requires defined timelines, transparency measures, and remedial pathways to protect liberty and effective j...
Settlement-price depression requires proof of manipulation, not merely short exposure, late selling, or below-market orders, preserving disclosure pen...
Income Declaration Scheme declarations can evidence share-capital sources, while round-tripped funds and cash-linked credits require further verificat...
Section 124's first proviso permits oral notice at the concerned...
Waiver of written show-cause notice may prevent a later procedural challenge after participation in customs adjudication, preserving statutory appellate remedy.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 124's first proviso permits oral notice at the concerned person's request and requires a genuine, effective opportunity to know and answer the allegations rather than service of a prescribed written form. Where an importer expressly waived a formal show-cause notice, participated in customs adjudication, and raised no contemporaneous objection, the absence of a separate written notice did not constitute a jurisdictional defect permitting recourse to writ jurisdiction despite the statutory appeal. The importer was relegated to the appellate remedy, with merits left open. No separate provisional-release direction was issued because detention was under consideration in another writ proceeding and interim relief could be sought before the appellate forum.
Section 124's first proviso permits oral notice at the concerned person's request and requires a genuine, effective opportunity to know and answer the allegations rather than service of a prescribed written form. Where an importer expressly waived a formal show-cause notice, participated in customs adjudication, and raised no contemporaneous objection, the absence of a separate written notice did not constitute a jurisdictional defect permitting recourse to writ jurisdiction despite the statutory appeal. The importer was relegated to the appellate remedy, with merits left open. No separate provisional-release direction was issued because detention was under consideration in another writ proceeding and interim relief could be sought before the appellate forum.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
