Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Third-party loose sheets may trigger investigation but cannot,...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or ownership.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Third-party loose sheets may trigger investigation but cannot, without reliable evidence linking the assessee to the recorded transaction, prove unexplained expenditure. Presumptions attached to seized documents apply to the person from whose possession or control they are recovered; they do not establish the alleged payer, source or movement of funds. Actual incurrence is foundational, so an uncorroborated allegation cannot shift the burden of proof. Nor does a third-party reference establish ownership of unrecorded money; the statutory requirements for unexplained money and expenditure are distinct. These deficiencies made both additions unsustainable. Evaluation of material already on the assessment record does not amount to admitting additional evidence.
Third-party loose sheets may trigger investigation but cannot, without reliable evidence linking the assessee to the recorded transaction, prove unexplained expenditure. Presumptions attached to seized documents apply to the person from whose possession or control they are recovered; they do not establish the alleged payer, source or movement of funds. Actual incurrence is foundational, so an uncorroborated allegation cannot shift the burden of proof. Nor does a third-party reference establish ownership of unrecorded money; the statutory requirements for unexplained money and expenditure are distinct. These deficiencies made both additions unsustainable. Evaluation of material already on the assessment record does not amount to admitting additional evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.