Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Arbitration of SEZ sub-lease monetary claims preserves rent, maintenance, termination, improvements and damages disputes while unused premises are vac...
Scientific research approval grants a research association tax recognition, subject to annual donor reporting, certification, and regulatory complianc...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Post-1 April 2021 searches are deemed under Explanation 2(i) to...
Post-search reassessment: Statutorily deemed income-escape information requires section 148 proceedings instead of continued scrutiny assessment under the new framework.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Post-1 April 2021 searches are deemed under Explanation 2(i) to section 148 to provide information suggesting that income has escaped assessment. This statutory deeming requires reassessment proceedings under section 148 rather than continuation and completion of a scrutiny assessment under section 143(3). Completing a scrutiny assessment despite the prescribed procedure creates a jurisdictional defect, rendering the assessment invalid. The requirement concerns the mandatory procedural route following a qualifying search.
Post-1 April 2021 searches are deemed under Explanation 2(i) to section 148 to provide information suggesting that income has escaped assessment. This statutory deeming requires reassessment proceedings under section 148 rather than continuation and completion of a scrutiny assessment under section 143(3). Completing a scrutiny assessment despite the prescribed procedure creates a jurisdictional defect, rendering the assessment invalid. The requirement concerns the mandatory procedural route following a qualifying search.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.