Waiver of written show-cause notice may prevent a later procedural challenge after participation in customs adjudication, preserving statutory appella...
Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 97814 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Unchallenged order-in-original conditions requiring payment of customs duty, redemption fine and penalty for release of detained gold jewellery cannot be assailed indirectly after the available remedies against that order were not pursued. Earlier writ proceedings directing release in accordance with the order do not determine its validity. Recovery of customs duty as a condition of redemption therefore remains enforceable. Detention charges recovered on release may be challenged only upon establishing that their recovery contravened statutory provisions; no such statutory infirmity was shown.
Unchallenged order-in-original conditions requiring payment of customs duty, redemption fine and penalty for release of detained gold jewellery cannot be assailed indirectly after the available remedies against that order were not pursued. Earlier writ proceedings directing release in accordance with the order do not determine its validity. Recovery of customs duty as a condition of redemption therefore remains enforceable. Detention charges recovered on release may be challenged only upon establishing that their recovery contravened statutory provisions; no such statutory infirmity was shown.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
