Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
Individual shareholders do not, merely by virtue of shareholding, qualify as aggrieved persons entitled to appeal approval of a corporate debtor's resolution plan. Allegations that post-approval modifications were fraudulent cannot expand standing unless supported by specific material. Homebuyers who have not independently challenged the resolution plan cannot contest it indirectly by supporting a shareholder's appeal. The shareholder's challenge to the approved resolution plan was therefore treated as not maintainable, and the related interlocutory applications were rejected.
Individual shareholders do not, merely by virtue of shareholding, qualify as aggrieved persons entitled to appeal approval of a corporate debtor's resolution plan. Allegations that post-approval modifications were fraudulent cannot expand standing unless supported by specific material. Homebuyers who have not independently challenged the resolution plan cannot contest it indirectly by supporting a shareholder's appeal. The shareholder's challenge to the approved resolution plan was therefore treated as not maintainable, and the related interlocutory applications were rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.