Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Reassessment of a loan credit previously examined in scrutiny cannot rest on the same confirmation, bank statements and balance sheet without fresh information or tangible material; adopting a different view is an impermissible change of opinion. Separately, an electronic notice served on or after 1 April 2021 must follow section 148A: a show-cause notice, supply of material, consideration of the taxpayer's reply, and an order before issuing a notice under section 148. Failure to follow this sequence invalidates reassessment. On these independent grounds, the reassessment notice and consequential order were quashed, without deciding the loan-credit addition on merits.
Reassessment of a loan credit previously examined in scrutiny cannot rest on the same confirmation, bank statements and balance sheet without fresh information or tangible material; adopting a different view is an impermissible change of opinion. Separately, an electronic notice served on or after 1 April 2021 must follow section 148A: a show-cause notice, supply of material, consideration of the taxpayer's reply, and an order before issuing a notice under section 148. Failure to follow this sequence invalidates reassessment. On these independent grounds, the reassessment notice and consequential order were quashed, without deciding the loan-credit addition on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.