Judicial discipline requires consistent reassessment treatment where identical facts were decided for the same taxpayer in the preceding assessment ye...
Agreement-date stamp valuation requires the same registered property, fixed consideration, and qualifying payment; an unrelated prior booking cannot a...
Page of 4894
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 97867 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deletion of reassessment additions through an appeal-effect order removed the basis for concealment penalty, as no concealed income remained when the penalty order was passed. The Tribunal therefore deleted the concealment penalty. Penalty for non-compliance with statutory notices was also deleted where the assessee had stated, through affidavits, unfamiliarity with tax law and reliance on a professional for compliance. The Tribunal treated these circumstances as warranting relief in the interest of justice, allowing both appeals and deleting both penalties.
Deletion of reassessment additions through an appeal-effect order removed the basis for concealment penalty, as no concealed income remained when the penalty order was passed. The Tribunal therefore deleted the concealment penalty. Penalty for non-compliance with statutory notices was also deleted where the assessee had stated, through affidavits, unfamiliarity with tax law and reliance on a professional for compliance. The Tribunal treated these circumstances as warranting relief in the interest of justice, allowing both appeals and deleting both penalties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.