Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Page of 4886
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 97705 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Omission of the provision defining related-party purchases as specified domestic transactions, without a saving clause, removed the statutory foundation for penalties for failure to furnish Form 3CEB. Omission is distinguished from repeal: absent a saving provision, it does not preserve a right to initiate or continue proceedings based on the omitted provision. Penalties imposed for the relevant assessment years were therefore unsustainable.
Omission of the provision defining related-party purchases as specified domestic transactions, without a saving clause, removed the statutory foundation for penalties for failure to furnish Form 3CEB. Omission is distinguished from repeal: absent a saving provision, it does not preserve a right to initiate or continue proceedings based on the omitted provision. Penalties imposed for the relevant assessment years were therefore unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.