Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Judicial discipline requires a High Court to follow a Coordinate...
Judicial discipline requires consistent reassessment treatment where identical facts were decided for the same taxpayer in the preceding assessment year.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Judicial discipline requires a High Court to follow a Coordinate Bench decision in the same assessee's preceding assessment year where the material facts are identical. In reassessment proceedings concerning an alleged bogus insurance-brokerage transaction, the facts differed only by assessment year from those previously considered. That identity of facts precluded a different view on the challenge to the preliminary reassessment order and consequential reassessment notice. The writ petition was therefore dismissed.
Judicial discipline requires a High Court to follow a Coordinate Bench decision in the same assessee's preceding assessment year where the material facts are identical. In reassessment proceedings concerning an alleged bogus insurance-brokerage transaction, the facts differed only by assessment year from those previously considered. That identity of facts precluded a different view on the challenge to the preliminary reassessment order and consequential reassessment notice. The writ petition was therefore dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4884 
