Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) does not follow merely from a Section 43B disallowance where statutory tax liabilities were not claimed as expenditure, were disclosed in the tax audit report, and rested on a plausible interpretation; a quantum addition alone does not establish inaccurate particulars. Foreign dividend income disclosed in Schedule SI and taxed at the applicable special rate is not concealed merely because it was omitted from the computation summary, where the mismatch was inadvertent and rectification was voluntarily sought before revisionary proceedings. Penalties relating to both items were deleted, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) does not follow merely from a Section 43B disallowance where statutory tax liabilities were not claimed as expenditure, were disclosed in the tax audit report, and rested on a plausible interpretation; a quantum addition alone does not establish inaccurate particulars. Foreign dividend income disclosed in Schedule SI and taxed at the applicable special rate is not concealed merely because it was omitted from the computation summary, where the mismatch was inadvertent and rectification was voluntarily sought before revisionary proceedings. Penalties relating to both items were deleted, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4883 
