Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
Following a search under section 132, assessment of search-related escaped income must proceed through the special reassessment mechanism under section 148 rather than the general scrutiny-assessment route under section 143(3). Consequently, a regular assessment made under section 143(3) for the relevant post-search assessment was treated as unsustainable in law and quashed, rendering the remaining grounds academic. The principle limits recourse to ordinary scrutiny assessment where the prescribed search-linked reassessment framework applies.
Following a search under section 132, assessment of search-related escaped income must proceed through the special reassessment mechanism under section 148 rather than the general scrutiny-assessment route under section 143(3). Consequently, a regular assessment made under section 143(3) for the relevant post-search assessment was treated as unsustainable in law and quashed, rendering the remaining grounds academic. The principle limits recourse to ordinary scrutiny assessment where the prescribed search-linked reassessment framework applies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.