Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
BSE futures and options trade profits disclosed for tax were supported by contract notes, tax records, bank statements, annual reports, transaction statements and account confirmations. Treating those profits as unexplained cash credit requires material showing that the broker or counterparty was tainted; no such material was identified. The preponderance-of-probabilities assessment distinguished alleged pre-arranged reversal trades involving loss-making entities from profitable trades with no identified loss-making counterparty. The trades were accepted as genuine, resulting in deletion of the unexplained cash credit addition and the consequential alleged commission expenditure addition under Section 69C.
BSE futures and options trade profits disclosed for tax were supported by contract notes, tax records, bank statements, annual reports, transaction statements and account confirmations. Treating those profits as unexplained cash credit requires material showing that the broker or counterparty was tainted; no such material was identified. The preponderance-of-probabilities assessment distinguished alleged pre-arranged reversal trades involving loss-making entities from profitable trades with no identified loss-making counterparty. The trades were accepted as genuine, resulting in deletion of the unexplained cash credit addition and the consequential alleged commission expenditure addition under Section 69C.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.