Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
Section 144B requires a personal hearing in a faceless...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 144B requires a personal hearing in a faceless assessment when the assessee specifically requests one; refusal breaches the statutory procedure and principles of natural justice. The applicable standard operating procedure ordinarily requires at least seven days to answer a final show-cause notice, unless curtailment is necessary because of the assessment limitation date. Without reasons for a shorter period, the response opportunity is inadequate. Denial of either safeguard resulted in quashing of the assessment, consequential demand and penalty proceedings, with fresh assessment directed after granting a hearing and opportunity for further submissions.
Section 144B requires a personal hearing in a faceless assessment when the assessee specifically requests one; refusal breaches the statutory procedure and principles of natural justice. The applicable standard operating procedure ordinarily requires at least seven days to answer a final show-cause notice, unless curtailment is necessary because of the assessment limitation date. Without reasons for a shorter period, the response opportunity is inadequate. Denial of either safeguard resulted in quashing of the assessment, consequential demand and penalty proceedings, with fresh assessment directed after granting a hearing and opportunity for further submissions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.