Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Embezzlement losses incurred by a charitable blood bank may be...
Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefit.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Embezzlement losses incurred by a charitable blood bank may be allowed where detailed FIR allegations and the institution's conduct establish misappropriation, even if criminal proceedings have not reached a final outcome. Misappropriation by persons managing the institution does not, merely for that reason, constitute a benefit to specified persons. Where the resulting loss is absolute or irrecoverable, disallowance on the basis of an alleged benefit to specified persons is not warranted. The disallowance of the claimed embezzlement loss was deleted.
Embezzlement losses incurred by a charitable blood bank may be allowed where detailed FIR allegations and the institution's conduct establish misappropriation, even if criminal proceedings have not reached a final outcome. Misappropriation by persons managing the institution does not, merely for that reason, constitute a benefit to specified persons. Where the resulting loss is absolute or irrecoverable, disallowance on the basis of an alleged benefit to specified persons is not warranted. The disallowance of the claimed embezzlement loss was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.