Unverified Insight Portal Information Cannot Justify Reassessment Without a Verified Taxpayer-Specific Income-Escape Nexus or Demonstrated Application...
Assessing Officer jurisdiction after statutory transfer invalidates reassessment notices issued by transferor officers and nullifies resulting proceed...
Consequential appeal-effect orders must implement rectification deleting working-capital adjustments and reconsider the resulting arm's-length range c...
Discounted cash flow valuation protects share premium where projections are reasonable, while audited book expenses defeat unexplained-expenditure add...
Section 54 construction relief survives pre-transfer commencement when completion occurs within the statutory period, excluding ineligible spouse-owne...
Statutory demand notice sent by registered post to the drawer's correct address is deemed served under a rebuttable presumption, even if received by the drawer's mother; giving notice does not require the drawer's personal receipt. The drawer must rebut service by proving an incorrect address, non-delivery at that address, or lack of knowledge. Where the address was undisputed and used for summons and proceedings, the presumption remained unrebutted, the notice requirement was met, and the conviction was restored. A coordinate-Bench ruling treating receipt by a spouse as invalid service was per incuriam for disregarding binding larger-Bench authority and lacked binding force under Article 141.
Statutory demand notice sent by registered post to the drawer's correct address is deemed served under a rebuttable presumption, even if received by the drawer's mother; giving notice does not require the drawer's personal receipt. The drawer must rebut service by proving an incorrect address, non-delivery at that address, or lack of knowledge. Where the address was undisputed and used for summons and proceedings, the presumption remained unrebutted, the notice requirement was met, and the conviction was restored. A coordinate-Bench ruling treating receipt by a spouse as invalid service was per incuriam for disregarding binding larger-Bench authority and lacked binding force under Article 141.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.