Investigation deposits refunded after failed customs demands fall outside the statutory appellate pre-deposit interest regime and may attract compensa...
Resolution plan finality extinguishes unquantified operational-creditor claims and pending proceedings unless the approved plan expressly preserves th...
Stakeholder-list modification permits liquidators to update entries on new information, subject to notifying the Adjudicating Authority within prescri...
Jewellery carried in excess of the quantity permissible under the Indian Customs Baggage Rules, 2026, was detained despite the petitioners' claim that it was brought for a marriage and not for smuggling or sale. The petitioners may seek return of the seized jewellery from the customs authority, which must adjudicate the applications. An admitted breach of the baggage rules may be resolved through imposition of a minor penalty with the petitioners' consent.
Jewellery carried in excess of the quantity permissible under the Indian Customs Baggage Rules, 2026, was detained despite the petitioners' claim that it was brought for a marriage and not for smuggling or sale. The petitioners may seek return of the seized jewellery from the customs authority, which must adjudicate the applications. An admitted breach of the baggage rules may be resolved through imposition of a minor penalty with the petitioners' consent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4883 
