E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Section 110(2) requires return of seized goods where no notice is issued within the prescribed period, unless the period is timely extended under its first proviso. Provisional release does not suspend this consequence, particularly where the provisional-release order excludes the goods concerned. Continued detention of imported machines and spare parts after one year without notice was therefore illegal, and release was directed subject to execution of a bond equal to their value.
Section 110(2) requires return of seized goods where no notice is issued within the prescribed period, unless the period is timely extended under its first proviso. Provisional release does not suspend this consequence, particularly where the provisional-release order excludes the goods concerned. Continued detention of imported machines and spare parts after one year without notice was therefore illegal, and release was directed subject to execution of a bond equal to their value.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.