COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
681 to 700 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Consent terms filed jointly in oppression and mismanagement proceedings were incorporated into the appellate disposition, making the settlement binding on the parties' inter se rights, liabilities and conduct. The appeal challenging findings that amendments to the articles of association and a rights issue were oppressive was allowed by consent, and those portions of the impugned order were quashed. No independent adjudication of the challenged merits occurred.
Consent terms filed jointly in oppression and mismanagement proceedings were incorporated into the appellate disposition, making the settlement binding on the parties' inter se rights, liabilities and conduct. The appeal challenging findings that amendments to the articles of association and a rights issue were oppressive was allowed by consent, and those portions of the impugned order were quashed. No independent adjudication of the challenged merits occurred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.