E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Premature IGST-demand proceedings for alleged non-fulfilment of an EPCG export obligation should be left for Revenue consideration in accordance with law. The High Court found no basis to interfere with the CESTAT order holding that initiation was premature. CESTAT observations on revenue neutrality, based on the assessee's data regarding IGST payment and input tax credit, remained subject to Revenue verification and did not bar fresh examination. Revenue may verify the data afresh and decide the matter in accordance with law.
Premature IGST-demand proceedings for alleged non-fulfilment of an EPCG export obligation should be left for Revenue consideration in accordance with law. The High Court found no basis to interfere with the CESTAT order holding that initiation was premature. CESTAT observations on revenue neutrality, based on the assessee's data regarding IGST payment and input tax credit, remained subject to Revenue verification and did not bar fresh examination. Revenue may verify the data afresh and decide the matter in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.