Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Concurrent anticipatory-bail jurisdiction permits applications before either forum, while secured evidence may negate custodial interrogation in GST e...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Financial-institution nominee directors are protected from...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaults.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Financial-institution nominee directors are protected from liability arising merely from their directorship, including good-faith acts or omissions in discharging directorial duties. A nominee and independent non-executive director who had no material relationship or transaction with the company or its management, and no involvement in daily operations, deposit solicitation, or repayment, was not liable for the company's non-compliance with a deposit-repayment order. Criminal proceedings alleging that non-compliance were quashed against that director.
Financial-institution nominee directors are protected from liability arising merely from their directorship, including good-faith acts or omissions in discharging directorial duties. A nominee and independent non-executive director who had no material relationship or transaction with the company or its management, and no involvement in daily operations, deposit solicitation, or repayment, was not liable for the company's non-compliance with a deposit-repayment order. Criminal proceedings alleging that non-compliance were quashed against that director.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.