Credit-note turnover adjustments preserve inverted-duty refunds, while ministerial re-computation does not constitute an impermissible appellate reman...
Revisional jurisdiction over export quota premium deductions requires both error and Revenue prejudice; a permissible assessment view cannot be displa...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment proceedings alleging fictitious mutual-fund losses and dividend income were quashed where the taxpayer was identically situated to one covered by a final earlier decision and the Revenue did not dispute its applicability. The order under section 148A(d) and the notice under section 148 were set aside because the earlier ruling had already quashed materially similar reassessment action on identical facts.
Reassessment proceedings alleging fictitious mutual-fund losses and dividend income were quashed where the taxpayer was identically situated to one covered by a final earlier decision and the Revenue did not dispute its applicability. The order under section 148A(d) and the notice under section 148 were set aside because the earlier ruling had already quashed materially similar reassessment action on identical facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.