Business expenditure and depreciation rules allow operational outgoings while limiting disallowances for personal elements and unsupported third-party...
Compromise-and-arrangement extensions may accommodate debt assignment where creditor commercial judgment supports value maximisation and avoids proced...
Delayed-payment surcharge is not taxable tolerance consideration where it penalises default, while meter testing follows electricity distribution trea...
Sufficient cause for delayed revenue income-tax appeals requires bona fides, due diligence and a credible explanation; otherwise limitation bars appea...
Inverted-duty-structure refunds remain available for unchanged-rate apparel supplies despite trader status and require tax-period-specific computation...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
781 to 800 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deletion of a negative working-capital adjustment in...
Consequential appeal-effect orders must implement rectification deleting working-capital adjustments and reconsider the resulting arm's-length range claim.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Deletion of a negative working-capital adjustment in rectification proceedings required implementation through a consequential appeal-effect order. The Assessing Officer was required to consider whether, after that deletion, the taxpayer's margin fell within the permissible arm's-length range and could reach a contrary conclusion only after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The appeal-effect order was directed to be passed within 15 days, with liberty to seek revival if the consequential order caused grievance.
Deletion of a negative working-capital adjustment in rectification proceedings required implementation through a consequential appeal-effect order. The Assessing Officer was required to consider whether, after that deletion, the taxpayer's margin fell within the permissible arm's-length range and could reach a contrary conclusion only after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The appeal-effect order was directed to be passed within 15 days, with liberty to seek revival if the consequential order caused grievance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
