E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Valid adoption of the DCF method for valuing unquoted equity shares under Rule 11UA requires any assessment correction to remain within that method. Management projections, historical losses, or later financial results may justify scrutiny of assumptions, growth rates, discount factors, terminal value and market conditions, but do not alone permit substitution of the NAV method. Rejection requires identified arithmetical errors, internal inconsistencies, factual inaccuracies, or inputs demonstrably contrary to contemporaneous material or industry norms. Applying these principles, the addition under section 56(2)(viib) was deleted and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Valid adoption of the DCF method for valuing unquoted equity shares under Rule 11UA requires any assessment correction to remain within that method. Management projections, historical losses, or later financial results may justify scrutiny of assumptions, growth rates, discount factors, terminal value and market conditions, but do not alone permit substitution of the NAV method. Rejection requires identified arithmetical errors, internal inconsistencies, factual inaccuracies, or inputs demonstrably contrary to contemporaneous material or industry norms. Applying these principles, the addition under section 56(2)(viib) was deleted and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.