Inaccurate-particulars penalties fail where transfer-pricing documentation shows good faith and due diligence, and underlying capital-gains additions ...
Transfer-pricing tolerance for software sub-licensing falls within the services range, eliminating the adjustment and requiring TDS-credit verificatio...
Customs Broker due diligence requires prescribed KYC, not detecting misdeclarations discoverable only through physical examination, defeating licence ...
E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Discounted cash flow valuation of equity shares and compulsorily...
Discounted cash flow valuation protects share premium where projections are reasonable, while audited book expenses defeat unexplained-expenditure additions.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Discounted cash flow valuation of equity shares and compulsorily convertible preference shares must be assessed as at the valuation date; subsequent actual cash flows, initial operating losses, or absence of positive cash flows do not alone invalidate projections. Substitution of the discounted cash flow method with net asset value valuation was therefore inappropriate, and the share-premium addition was deleted. Vendor-confirmation differences did not justify treating recorded business expenses as unexplained where audited books recorded the transactions, payments passed through banking channels, and business operations funded the expenditure; the unexplained-expenditure addition was deleted. Penalty-initiation challenges were premature because penalty proceedings remain separate from assessment proceedings.
Discounted cash flow valuation of equity shares and compulsorily convertible preference shares must be assessed as at the valuation date; subsequent actual cash flows, initial operating losses, or absence of positive cash flows do not alone invalidate projections. Substitution of the discounted cash flow method with net asset value valuation was therefore inappropriate, and the share-premium addition was deleted. Vendor-confirmation differences did not justify treating recorded business expenses as unexplained where audited books recorded the transactions, payments passed through banking channels, and business operations funded the expenditure; the unexplained-expenditure addition was deleted. Penalty-initiation challenges were premature because penalty proceedings remain separate from assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.