E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Rectification jurisdiction permits correction only of a patent, manifest or self-evident error, not reassessment of evidence or review of an earlier view. Claims that additions for alleged on-money receipts failed to consider seized material, related orders, a co-ordinate Bench decision and precedents on income extrapolation did not establish a mistake apparent from the record where those materials had been considered. The rectification applications therefore amounted to an impermissible review and were dismissed.
Rectification jurisdiction permits correction only of a patent, manifest or self-evident error, not reassessment of evidence or review of an earlier view. Claims that additions for alleged on-money receipts failed to consider seized material, related orders, a co-ordinate Bench decision and precedents on income extrapolation did not establish a mistake apparent from the record where those materials had been considered. The rectification applications therefore amounted to an impermissible review and were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4884 
