Permanent-establishment reassessment cannot revisit scrutinised disclosures; extended reopening fails without undisclosed material facts and within st...
Modified returns after business reorganisation must be assessed within pending proceedings, barring parallel scrutiny and consequential transfer prici...
Turnover mismatches under percentage-completion accounting cannot alone establish suppressed income where customer advances remain recorded as liabili...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
541 to 560 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rectification jurisdiction permits correction only of a patent, manifest or self-evident error, not reassessment of evidence or review of an earlier view. Claims that additions for alleged on-money receipts failed to consider seized material, related orders, a co-ordinate Bench decision and precedents on income extrapolation did not establish a mistake apparent from the record where those materials had been considered. The rectification applications therefore amounted to an impermissible review and were dismissed.
Rectification jurisdiction permits correction only of a patent, manifest or self-evident error, not reassessment of evidence or review of an earlier view. Claims that additions for alleged on-money receipts failed to consider seized material, related orders, a co-ordinate Bench decision and precedents on income extrapolation did not establish a mistake apparent from the record where those materials had been considered. The rectification applications therefore amounted to an impermissible review and were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
