Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
First-motion scrutiny of a listed-company amalgamation scheme is generally confined to legality and public interest, leaving shareholders and creditors to assess the commercial proposal. An ante-dated appointed date requires justification, but its assessment must account for the regulatory and stock-exchange approval process applicable to listed entities. Delay in filing cannot be attributed to the company unless exclusively caused by its failure or default; valuation effects and delay may be examined at the second stage with regulatory and tax-authority input. The first-motion dismissal was set aside, and meetings were directed to be convened through appointment of a chairman and scrutinizers.
First-motion scrutiny of a listed-company amalgamation scheme is generally confined to legality and public interest, leaving shareholders and creditors to assess the commercial proposal. An ante-dated appointed date requires justification, but its assessment must account for the regulatory and stock-exchange approval process applicable to listed entities. Delay in filing cannot be attributed to the company unless exclusively caused by its failure or default; valuation effects and delay may be examined at the second stage with regulatory and tax-authority input. The first-motion dismissal was set aside, and meetings were directed to be convened through appointment of a chairman and scrutinizers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4888 
