Credit-note turnover adjustments preserve inverted-duty refunds, while ministerial re-computation does not constitute an impermissible appellate reman...
Revisional jurisdiction over export quota premium deductions requires both error and Revenue prejudice; a permissible assessment view cannot be displa...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Specified composite works contract services supplied to the...
Government water works contract GST concession applied before its withdrawal, while contractual tax reimbursement claims lay outside advance-ruling scope.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Specified composite works contract services supplied to the Government or a local authority for pipelines, conduits or plants for water supply, water treatment, or sewerage treatment or disposal attracted GST at 12% (6% CGST and 6% SGST) on 1 June 2022 under the concessional entry then in force. Omission of that entry from 18 July 2022 did not alter the rate on the queried date. A contractual entitlement to recover additional tax caused by a GST-rate increase falls outside advance-ruling jurisdiction because it is not among the exhaustively listed matters on which a ruling may be sought; the reimbursement question was therefore not answered.
Specified composite works contract services supplied to the Government or a local authority for pipelines, conduits or plants for water supply, water treatment, or sewerage treatment or disposal attracted GST at 12% (6% CGST and 6% SGST) on 1 June 2022 under the concessional entry then in force. Omission of that entry from 18 July 2022 did not alter the rate on the queried date. A contractual entitlement to recover additional tax caused by a GST-rate increase falls outside advance-ruling jurisdiction because it is not among the exhaustively listed matters on which a ruling may be sought; the reimbursement question was therefore not answered.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.