Food import sampling requirements support provisional release where unseized consignments conform to standards and raw areca classification is unestab...
Diagnostic microcuvette classification follows sole-use analytical function, placing specialised disposable cuvettes with their analyser rather than g...
Customs Broker licensing proceedings fail when their offence-report foundation collapses and authorisation, advisory, and KYC duties remain unbreached...
Tariff classification of Digital Axle Counters affirmed as electro-mechanical railway signalling equipment, eliminating duty, confiscation and penalty...
Specified composite works contract services supplied to the...
Government water works contract GST concession applied before its withdrawal, while contractual tax reimbursement claims lay outside advance-ruling scope.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Specified composite works contract services supplied to the Government or a local authority for pipelines, conduits or plants for water supply, water treatment, or sewerage treatment or disposal attracted GST at 12% (6% CGST and 6% SGST) on 1 June 2022 under the concessional entry then in force. Omission of that entry from 18 July 2022 did not alter the rate on the queried date. A contractual entitlement to recover additional tax caused by a GST-rate increase falls outside advance-ruling jurisdiction because it is not among the exhaustively listed matters on which a ruling may be sought; the reimbursement question was therefore not answered.
Specified composite works contract services supplied to the Government or a local authority for pipelines, conduits or plants for water supply, water treatment, or sewerage treatment or disposal attracted GST at 12% (6% CGST and 6% SGST) on 1 June 2022 under the concessional entry then in force. Omission of that entry from 18 July 2022 did not alter the rate on the queried date. A contractual entitlement to recover additional tax caused by a GST-rate increase falls outside advance-ruling jurisdiction because it is not among the exhaustively listed matters on which a ruling may be sought; the reimbursement question was therefore not answered.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4878 
