Unverified Insight Portal Information Cannot Justify Reassessment Without a Verified Taxpayer-Specific Income-Escape Nexus or Demonstrated Application...
Assessing Officer jurisdiction after statutory transfer invalidates reassessment notices issued by transferor officers and nullifies resulting proceed...
Consequential appeal-effect orders must implement rectification deleting working-capital adjustments and reconsider the resulting arm's-length range c...
Discounted cash flow valuation protects share premium where projections are reasonable, while audited book expenses defeat unexplained-expenditure add...
Section 54 construction relief survives pre-transfer commencement when completion occurs within the statutory period, excluding ineligible spouse-owne...
Additional evidence before the Tribunal may be filed under Rule 18(4) of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963 through a separate paper book supported by an application explaining the reasons. The High Court upheld admission of records retrieved after loss, damage or soiling, particularly because the Assessing Officer had incorrectly recorded that no material was produced. The Tribunal's findings on unexplained cash credits and trading liabilities were based on confirmations, transaction details, tax-deduction certificates, books of account and bank records. As reasoned factual findings disclosed no perversity, no substantial question of law arose and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Additional evidence before the Tribunal may be filed under Rule 18(4) of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963 through a separate paper book supported by an application explaining the reasons. The High Court upheld admission of records retrieved after loss, damage or soiling, particularly because the Assessing Officer had incorrectly recorded that no material was produced. The Tribunal's findings on unexplained cash credits and trading liabilities were based on confirmations, transaction details, tax-deduction certificates, books of account and bank records. As reasoned factual findings disclosed no perversity, no substantial question of law arose and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
