Compromise-and-arrangement extensions may accommodate debt assignment where creditor commercial judgment supports value maximisation and avoids proced...
Delayed-payment surcharge is not taxable tolerance consideration where it penalises default, while meter testing follows electricity distribution trea...
Sufficient cause for delayed revenue income-tax appeals requires bona fides, due diligence and a credible explanation; otherwise limitation bars appea...
Inverted-duty-structure refunds remain available for unchanged-rate apparel supplies despite trader status and require tax-period-specific computation...
Foundational assessment satisfaction is essential before initiating penalty for cash receipt of immovable-property sale consideration under section 27...
Recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer during...
Assessing Officer Satisfaction Requirement Bars Penalty for Cash Receipt in Immovable-Property Sale Cases Where Initiation Lacks Recorded Satisfaction.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer during assessment is required before penalty proceedings under section 271D can be initiated for cash receipt of immovable-property sale consideration. Where jurisdictionally binding precedent requires this satisfaction, a contrary Tribunal view based on law binding in another jurisdiction does not govern. When High Court interpretations diverge, the interpretation favourable to the assessee applies. On that basis, deletion of the penalty was sustained, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's cross-objection became infructuous.
Recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer during assessment is required before penalty proceedings under section 271D can be initiated for cash receipt of immovable-property sale consideration. Where jurisdictionally binding precedent requires this satisfaction, a contrary Tribunal view based on law binding in another jurisdiction does not govern. When High Court interpretations diverge, the interpretation favourable to the assessee applies. On that basis, deletion of the penalty was sustained, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's cross-objection became infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4888 
