E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Direct appeals to the Tribunal against an Assessing Officer's rectification order under section 154 are not maintainable where the statutory appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) has not first been filed. The prescribed appellate sequence requires the aggrieved taxpayer to pursue the first appellate remedy before approaching the Tribunal. An erroneous reference in Form No. 36 to a Commissioner (Appeals) order does not convert the proceeding into a valid appeal against that order.
Direct appeals to the Tribunal against an Assessing Officer's rectification order under section 154 are not maintainable where the statutory appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) has not first been filed. The prescribed appellate sequence requires the aggrieved taxpayer to pursue the first appellate remedy before approaching the Tribunal. An erroneous reference in Form No. 36 to a Commissioner (Appeals) order does not convert the proceeding into a valid appeal against that order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.