Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Page of 4879
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 97567 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Direct appeals to the Tribunal against an Assessing Officer's rectification order under section 154 are not maintainable where the statutory appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) has not first been filed. The prescribed appellate sequence requires the aggrieved taxpayer to pursue the first appellate remedy before approaching the Tribunal. An erroneous reference in Form No. 36 to a Commissioner (Appeals) order does not convert the proceeding into a valid appeal against that order.
Direct appeals to the Tribunal against an Assessing Officer's rectification order under section 154 are not maintainable where the statutory appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) has not first been filed. The prescribed appellate sequence requires the aggrieved taxpayer to pursue the first appellate remedy before approaching the Tribunal. An erroneous reference in Form No. 36 to a Commissioner (Appeals) order does not convert the proceeding into a valid appeal against that order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4879 
