Inaccurate-particulars penalties fail where transfer-pricing documentation shows good faith and due diligence, and underlying capital-gains additions ...
Transfer-pricing tolerance for software sub-licensing falls within the services range, eliminating the adjustment and requiring TDS-credit verificatio...
Customs Broker due diligence requires prescribed KYC, not detecting misdeclarations discoverable only through physical examination, defeating licence ...
E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
741 to 760 of 97755 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Provisional release of seized Ketamine Hydrochloride for export was warranted where a fresh export authorisation covered the same goods after the original authorisation had expired following replacement of the shipment batch. The High Court treated the delay in obtaining the fresh authorisation as technical because the goods remained unexported and the licensing authority had accepted the new authorisation as valid. Customs could not deny its effect merely because the licensing authority had not expressly authorised release of the seized goods. Union departments must maintain consistent positions on the same export transaction. The rejection of provisional release was quashed, subject to a Customs deposit, while adjudication and criminal proceedings remained unaffected.
Provisional release of seized Ketamine Hydrochloride for export was warranted where a fresh export authorisation covered the same goods after the original authorisation had expired following replacement of the shipment batch. The High Court treated the delay in obtaining the fresh authorisation as technical because the goods remained unexported and the licensing authority had accepted the new authorisation as valid. Customs could not deny its effect merely because the licensing authority had not expressly authorised release of the seized goods. Union departments must maintain consistent positions on the same export transaction. The rejection of provisional release was quashed, subject to a Customs deposit, while adjudication and criminal proceedings remained unaffected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4888 
