Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Page of 4879
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 97567 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Relevant date for refund of Kerala Flood Cess mistakenly paid through GSTR-3B is the date of subsequent remittance into the correct account. Where the cess was initially paid with GSTR-3B and later deposited through the prescribed mechanism, the two-year refund limitation under Section 54 runs from the latter payment rather than the erroneous earlier payment. The refund application is therefore treated as timely, requiring the competent authority to reconsider it and issue orders within one month.
Relevant date for refund of Kerala Flood Cess mistakenly paid through GSTR-3B is the date of subsequent remittance into the correct account. Where the cess was initially paid with GSTR-3B and later deposited through the prescribed mechanism, the two-year refund limitation under Section 54 runs from the latter payment rather than the erroneous earlier payment. The refund application is therefore treated as timely, requiring the competent authority to reconsider it and issue orders within one month.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4879 
