Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Concurrent anticipatory-bail jurisdiction permits applications before either forum, while secured evidence may negate custodial interrogation in GST e...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 152(3) preserves the pre-amendment reassessment regime for searches initiated from 1 April 2021 to 1 September 2024. Where information concerning an assessee arose from a third-party search within that transitional period, the former framework, including the relevant Explanation to section 148, remained applicable despite its omission. A direct reassessment notice under section 148 could therefore be issued without a prior notice under section 148A(b). The jurisdictional objection failed; the assessee could pursue the statutory appeal on the additions but could not reopen that jurisdictional issue.
Section 152(3) preserves the pre-amendment reassessment regime for searches initiated from 1 April 2021 to 1 September 2024. Where information concerning an assessee arose from a third-party search within that transitional period, the former framework, including the relevant Explanation to section 148, remained applicable despite its omission. A direct reassessment notice under section 148 could therefore be issued without a prior notice under section 148A(b). The jurisdictional objection failed; the assessee could pursue the statutory appeal on the additions but could not reopen that jurisdictional issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.