Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 152(3) preserves the pre-amendment reassessment regime for searches initiated from 1 April 2021 to 1 September 2024. Where information concerning an assessee arose from a third-party search within that transitional period, the former framework, including the relevant Explanation to section 148, remained applicable despite its omission. A direct reassessment notice under section 148 could therefore be issued without a prior notice under section 148A(b). The jurisdictional objection failed; the assessee could pursue the statutory appeal on the additions but could not reopen that jurisdictional issue.
Section 152(3) preserves the pre-amendment reassessment regime for searches initiated from 1 April 2021 to 1 September 2024. Where information concerning an assessee arose from a third-party search within that transitional period, the former framework, including the relevant Explanation to section 148, remained applicable despite its omission. A direct reassessment notice under section 148 could therefore be issued without a prior notice under section 148A(b). The jurisdictional objection failed; the assessee could pursue the statutory appeal on the additions but could not reopen that jurisdictional issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4883 
