Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Page of 4879
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 97567 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Writ jurisdiction remained available despite a statutory appellate remedy because the disputed GST classification involved an apparent jurisdictional error of law without factual dispute; the non-functionality of the Tribunal when the petitions were filed also supported intervention. Licensing of copyright in cinematographic films by the original holder was classified as intellectual-property rights in goods other than information technology software: a passive audiovisual film lacks the computer-based manipulation or interactivity required for software, and its delivery method does not alter the supply's character. Pre-1 October 2021 GST regularisation at 12% on an "as is where is" basis extended to producer-to-distributor theatrical-rights licensing and could not be confined to downstream transactions, rendering the contrary classification and demands erroneous.
Writ jurisdiction remained available despite a statutory appellate remedy because the disputed GST classification involved an apparent jurisdictional error of law without factual dispute; the non-functionality of the Tribunal when the petitions were filed also supported intervention. Licensing of copyright in cinematographic films by the original holder was classified as intellectual-property rights in goods other than information technology software: a passive audiovisual film lacks the computer-based manipulation or interactivity required for software, and its delivery method does not alter the supply's character. Pre-1 October 2021 GST regularisation at 12% on an "as is where is" basis extended to producer-to-distributor theatrical-rights licensing and could not be confined to downstream transactions, rendering the contrary classification and demands erroneous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4879 
