Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Page of 4879
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 97567 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Book-entry conversion of compulsorily convertible debentures into compulsorily convertible preference shares did not constitute a sum received during the relevant previous year for the cash-credit provision. Share premium arising solely from that conversion therefore could not be treated as an unexplained cash credit, rendering the related addition unsustainable. Penalty founded solely on the deleted share-premium addition had no surviving basis. Penalty for non-reporting income also did not arise for principal additions that were set aside; for additions remanded for fresh consideration, penalty could be considered only if they were reiterated. The Revenue's appeals were dismissed for want of a substantial question of law.
Book-entry conversion of compulsorily convertible debentures into compulsorily convertible preference shares did not constitute a sum received during the relevant previous year for the cash-credit provision. Share premium arising solely from that conversion therefore could not be treated as an unexplained cash credit, rendering the related addition unsustainable. Penalty founded solely on the deleted share-premium addition had no surviving basis. Penalty for non-reporting income also did not arise for principal additions that were set aside; for additions remanded for fresh consideration, penalty could be considered only if they were reiterated. The Revenue's appeals were dismissed for want of a substantial question of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4879 
