Government water works contract GST concession applied before its withdrawal, while contractual tax reimbursement claims lay outside advance-ruling sc...
Stamp valuation increases after registration-fee payment led to deletion of property-purchase addition within tolerance and without valuation referral...
Capital Asset Conversion Requires Proven Business Stock Treatment; Paper Consideration in Spousal Flat Transfers Does Not Create Taxable Business Inco...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 270A penalty for under-reporting was not leviable under the provision where a health and education cess deduction claim, made in reliance on judicial decisions, was withdrawn during assessment after a retrospective amendment. Coordinate Tribunal decisions on the identical issue supported the conclusion that withdrawal of the claim did not justify penalty. The penalty was consequently deleted.
Section 270A penalty for under-reporting was not leviable under the provision where a health and education cess deduction claim, made in reliance on judicial decisions, was withdrawn during assessment after a retrospective amendment. Coordinate Tribunal decisions on the identical issue supported the conclusion that withdrawal of the claim did not justify penalty. The penalty was consequently deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.