Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Under the second proviso to section 153A(1), initiation of a search abates a scrutiny assessment that remains pending for an assessment year within the prescribed search period. Accordingly, once the pending assessment for AY 2013-14 abated, the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to complete the regular assessment under section 143(3). The resulting assessment was non-est, and proceedings consequential upon it were also non-est.
Under the second proviso to section 153A(1), initiation of a search abates a scrutiny assessment that remains pending for an assessment year within the prescribed search period. Accordingly, once the pending assessment for AY 2013-14 abated, the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to complete the regular assessment under section 143(3). The resulting assessment was non-est, and proceedings consequential upon it were also non-est.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.