Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Page of 4879
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 97567 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Under the second proviso to section 153A(1), initiation of a search abates a scrutiny assessment that remains pending for an assessment year within the prescribed search period. Accordingly, once the pending assessment for AY 2013-14 abated, the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to complete the regular assessment under section 143(3). The resulting assessment was non-est, and proceedings consequential upon it were also non-est.
Under the second proviso to section 153A(1), initiation of a search abates a scrutiny assessment that remains pending for an assessment year within the prescribed search period. Accordingly, once the pending assessment for AY 2013-14 abated, the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to complete the regular assessment under section 143(3). The resulting assessment was non-est, and proceedings consequential upon it were also non-est.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.